Hong Kong – Setting up of Fishermen Claims Appeal Board

Setting up of Fishermen Claims Appeal Board


     The Government today (August 25) announced the establishment of the Fishermen Claims Appeal Board (FCAB) to process ex-gratia allowance (EGA) appeal cases by owners of fishing vessels (exceeding 15 metres in length) who are affected by marine works projects in Hong Kong waters.

     The FCAB is a non-statutory body set up on an ad hoc basis and comprising one non-official Chairman and four non-official members. Mr Yeung Ming-tai has been appointed as the Chairman of the FCAB and the members are Mr Au Pak-ching, Dr Chung Shan-shan, Mr James Kong and Mr Tam Kin-lok. These appointments take immediate effect. Their term will last until the completion of work on all appeals.

     The Government has put in place a mechanism to grant EGA to owners of fishing vessels affected by marine works projects, subject to the fulfilment of certain eligibility criteria. An interdepartmental working group (IWG) within the Government has been set up to handle EGA applications from owners of fishing vessels arising from a total of 119 marine works projects in Hong Kong waters, and received a total of 148 applications during the registration period. EGA applicants feeling aggrieved at the decisions made by the IWG concerning the EGA amount offered to them or about their eligibility may lodge appeals to the FCAB. Three EGA applicants filed appeals against the IWG’s decision (on their eligibility). These appeals will be heard by the FCAB. 

     The terms of reference of the FCAB are: 

  • to hear and consider the appeals against the decisions of the IWG relating to the appellants’ eligibility for EGA and/or the amount of EGA granted under the Government policy on granting EGA to owners of fishing vessels affected by marine works projects; and
  • having examined any new or additional information/evidence provided by the appellants (or their representatives) or the relevant departments, the relevance of and the weight to be given to such information/evidence, to consider whether to uphold the IWG’s decisions on the appellants’ cases or to revise the decisions, and to determine the amount of EGA payable to the appellants, as appropriate.

     The secretariat of the FCAB will be housed in the Lands Department.

Hong Kong – LCQ6: Setting up “wealth fund”

LCQ6: Setting up “wealth fund”


     Following is a question by the Hon Mrs Regina Ip (Hon Shiu Ka-fai to ask on her behalf) and a reply by the Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury, Mr Christopher Hui, in the Legislative Council today (July 6):


     Currently, the Future Fund (FF) is placed with the Exchange Fund (EF). In accordance with the Exchange Fund Ordinance, the statutory purposes for which the EF is established are to use the fund for such purposes as the Financial Secretary thinks fit affecting, either directly or indirectly, the exchange value of the currency of Hong Kong, to maintain Hong Kong as an international financial centre, and to maintain the stability and the integrity of the monetary and financial systems of Hong Kong. Unless the Financial Secretary exercises his discretion pursuant to the resolution for the establishment of the Land Fund passed by the Provisional Legislative Council under section 29 of the Public Finance Ordinance on July 23, 1997, the investment of the FF is governed by the Public Finance Ordinance. As it is inappropriate to use the EF for high-risk investments, will the Government inform this Council whether it will, by drawing reference from the experience of the Singapore Government in using government assets to set up “Temasek”, consider “packaging” the three road harbour crossings in Hong Kong after the revocation of the franchise of the Western Harbour Crossing in August next year to set up a “wealth fund”, which is to be used under a public-private partnership approach to invest in sound investment projects with long-term value-added potential in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area and the Northern Metropolis; if so, of the specific proposals; if not, the reasons for that?


Acting President,

     I am very grateful to the proposal to set up a “wealth fund”, with the ultimate aim of promoting investments in sound investment projects with long term value-added potential in Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area (GBA) and the Northern Metropolis. The proposal is actually in line with the Government’s strategy of promoting Hong Kong’s long-term development by making good use of the Future Fund (FF) and setting up the Hong Kong Growth Portfolio (HKGP). In response to the question, I, having consulted the Transport and Logistics Bureau on tunnel-related issues, provide a consolidated reply as follows: 

     On January 1, 2016, the FF was established by the Government with an initial endowment of $219.7 billion, being the balance of the Land Fund at the time, held as a notional savings account. On July 1, 2016, the Government injected one-third of the 2015-16 fiscal surplus, i.e. $4.8 billion, into the FF as its first periodic top-up. The FF is meant to secure higher returns for the fiscal reserves through long-term investments.

     A large proportion of the FF is placed with the Exchange Fund and linked to the returns of its Investment Portfolio and Long-Term Growth Portfolio. Up to 2021, the FF has achieved an average composite rate of investment return of around 9.8 per cent. To make better use of the FF, the Financial Secretary (FS) announced in the 2020-21 Budget that 10 per cent of the FF, i.e. about $22 billion, will be deployed to set up the HKGP for making strategic investments in projects with a Hong Kong nexus, with a view to reinforcing Hong Kong’s status as a financial, trading and innovation and technology centre, as well as raising Hong Kong’s productivity and competitiveness in the long run, while seeking reasonable risk-adjusted returns.

     Besides, to support the development of the GBA and facilitate the expansion of Hong Kong’s industries in the GBA so as to enable further integration into our country’s overall development, the FS announced in the 2022-23 Budget that the Government would increase the funding allocated to the HKGP by $10 billion, of which $5 billion would be used to set up a GBA Investment Fund. The Fund will focus on projects in the GBA that can benefit Hong Kong, including those undertaken by Hong Kong-based companies or companies with investment in the GBA.

     As regards the Northern Metropolis, the FS also announced in the 2022-23 Budget that the Government would set aside $100 billion from the cumulative return of the FF to set up a dedicated fund in order to ensure that there would be sufficient funding for meeting the development needs under the Northern Metropolis Development Strategy and to expedite the implementation of projects in the area. The Northern Metropolis covers a number of projects, some of which are already underway. The Government will implement these projects in phases according to schedule with due consideration given to financial viability and sustainability. With the development of the Northern Metropolis, the private development projects in the area may also generate income for the Government.

     Under the existing arrangement, toll revenue is credited to the General Revenue Account (GRA) and its balance, together with the balances of other funds established under the Public Finance Ordinance (Cap.2) (including Land Fund and Capital Works Reserve Fund), will automatically become part of the fiscal reserves. As far as promoting investments in the GBA is concerned, we can follow the existing arrangement of making injections into the FF from the GRA if the Government finds it necessary to increase the size of the FF. As for developing the Northern Metropolis, the Government will consider and explore various financing options, including the feasibility of enabling private sector organisations’ participation in the financing and provision of public services under public-private partnership. In other words, apart from seeking funding approval from the Finance Committee of the Legislative Council, we will work out appropriate financing arrangements for different infrastructure projects in the Northern Metropolis by carefully taking into account various factors, including their characteristics, economic values, commercial viability, the need for the Government to take part in their operations and construction costs. It is therefore possible that a mixture of different options may be adopted in terms of the financial arrangements for the projects in the Northern Metropolis.

     However, we share Members’ goal of making good use of the Government’s assets and investing in sound investment projects with long-term value-added potential, so as to build a better Hong Kong.

     Thank you, Acting President.