SUBMIT PHOTO: Palantir Technologies took legal action against 2 of its previous senior engineers, implicating them of utilizing the software application business’s secret info to release a “copycat” company, Percepta AI.|Picture Credit: Reuters
< div id="schemaDiv" itemprop ="articleBody">
Palantir Technologies on Thursday took legal action against 2 of its previous senior engineers, implicating them of utilizing the software application business’s secret details to introduce a “copycat” company, Percepta AI.
The claim in Manhattan federal court declares that Radha Jain and Joanna Cohen were “entrusted with Palantir’s crown jewels,” including its source code and client details, and breached arrangements they signed with the business to protect that info.
Palantir stated that similar to its own AI-powered software application, Percepta’s items are developed to make organizations and federal government firms more effective utilizing information they currently have.
Jain left Palantir in November 2024 after assisting to style and construct its flagship software application, and Cohen, who dealt with AI services for private consumers, resigned in February, according to the claim.
Percepta AI, which is owned by equity capital company General Catalyst, was openly revealed previously this month.
“Jain’s and Cohen’s deception and violation of their agreements with Palantir are black and white,” the business stated in the suit.
Percepta, which is not an accused in the suit, and Jain did not right away react to ask for remark. Cohen might not instantly be reached.
Percepta employed a minimum of 10 previous Palantir staff members within months of its starting in 2015, and almost half its labor force are previous Palantir staffers, consisting of co-founder and CEO Hirsh Jain, according to the problem.
Palantir states Jain and Cohen signed contracts disallowing them from taking on the business for one year after leaving, from getting Palantir consumers or workers for 2 years, and from utilizing any of the business’s secret information outside their work.
The suit implicates Jain and Cohen of breaching those arrangements and looks for to require them to adhere to them.