< img src ="https://www.orfonline.org/public/uploads/posts/image/1761138232_img-sid.jpg" alt ="Strategic Intelligence Disclosure and India: The Way Forward">
When Brigadier General Frank Gr??fe called into his midnight Webex call with senior coworkers from the German flying force, the Luftwaffe, from his Singapore hotel space 2024, he had little factor to be worried. This, after all, was a safe line, impenetrable to foreign danger stars. Simply 2 weeks later on, Europe woke up to the shock of hearing the total audio recording of the 38-minute call, in all its granular information about Germany’s upcoming shipments of Taurus rockets to Ukraine, transmitted by RT, Russia’s state broadcaster. A subsequent examination by German counterintelligence authorities exposed that Russian intelligence officers had actually obstructed the call utilizing the hotel’s unsecured Wi-Fi. Rather of keeping this intelligence trick to notify their own tactical preparation, Russia took a leaf out of the Western playbook in the lead-up to and amidst the war in Ukraine considering that 2022, choosing to publicise the obstructed interactions and get a propaganda success over its foes through the usage of Strategic Intelligence Disclosure (SID).
In India, SID has actually stayed piecemeal, utilized partly and with reduced impact throughout durations of crisis than as part of a collective technique.
Control of the details surface through the efficient usage of digital media and real-time tactical interactions is all identified as core to the execution of reliable method. A nuanced method to and release of SID can offer substantial advantages for any federal government pursuing this end. In India, SID has actually stayed piecemeal, utilized partly and with reduced impact throughout durations of crisis than as part of a collective technique. This essay looks for to describe the advantages and threats of SID, emphasize cases of its current usage by worldwide powers, and contextualise its usage in relation to India’s existing tactical situation.
Context and Nuance
International intelligence firms have actually long identified the worth that SID gives the table. When intelligence is selectively revealed and incorporated as part of a larger info method, it can considerably enhance the deployer’s coercive capabilities and influence versus enemies. It can serve numerous interrelated goals: the general public humiliation of stated enemy to get a mental benefit, or to galvanise international viewpoint and diplomatic assistance in favour of one’s own story versus another’s.
It is this reasoning that has actually rationalized making use of SID by federal governments. As early as 1962, the United States (United States) selected to expose images intelligence (IMINT) in its belongings about the existence of Soviet rockets in Cuba before the UN Security Council to confine international viewpoint in the United States’s favour throughout the Missile Crisis. From 2021 onward, Western intelligence services– particularly the United States and UK’s, in coordination with Ukrainian security services– started a method of SID, initially revealing intelligence about Russian troop motions along the Ukrainian border to postpone the upcoming military project, and after that as soon as the war ended, obstructing and openly launching interactions amongst Russian soldiers and field leaders to deteriorate the foe’s spirits– with some even being inserted into documentary by personal artists later on to provide outsized public result.
SID can run the risk of the security of human representatives or technological sources of intelligence collection if utilized without care.
SID is not a silver bullet, and should be utilized wisely. Publicising incorrect or doctored intelligence under the umbrella regard to ‘SID’ brings long-lasting reputational and tactical threat, as shown by the exposed ‘slam dunk’ proof provided in 2003 by the United States before the UN Security Council about Iraq’s supposed WMDs. Furthermore, SID can run the risk of the security of human representatives or technological sources of intelligence collection if utilized without care. Federal governments have actually looked for to bypass these difficulties by relying on the public disclosure of intelligence evaluations rather than raw information, or if they pick to divulge the latter, having actually done so after taking actions to mask its origin. In spite of a few of these compromises, nevertheless, federal governments have actually in some cases picked to push ahead with SID versus enemies, as seen in 2018, when Turkish intelligence services selected to publicise audio and visual proof of the Saudi state’s responsibility in the killing of Jamal Khashoggi, regardless of divulging at the same time their bugging of the embassy in which it happened.
In addition, SID does not need to include avowed public disclosure alone, however might be performed in combination with more concealed methods to mask the origins of stated intelligence to preserve possible deniability through a method of deliberate ‘leakages’ to journalism or social networks. Israel has actually used such a technique in the past, initially selectively ‘dripping’ intelligence about the Lebanese Hezbollah’s belongings of precision-guided weapons to Arab and worldwide media in 2017 to require the latter to react openly and therefore constrain its decision-making movement. The exact same method was duplicated in 2018 with the general public disclosure of intelligence about Iran’s continuous nuclear weapons program at the UN, regardless of the JCPOA contract.
India and SID: A combined record
India is no complete stranger to SID. Amongst the very best recorded circumstances of its success as a tactical tool was throughout the Kargil War in 1999, when Indian intelligence obstructed and assisted to openly transmit a phone call in between Pervez Musharraf and Chief of General Staff General Aziz Khan showing not just Pakistan’s active sponsorship of Mujahideen fighters that it rejected supporting, however likewise the armed force’s insubordination to Pakistan’s civilian management led by Nawaz Sharif. According to previous R&AW Chief, Vikram Sood, the disclosure of this intelligence played an important function in Nawaz Sharif’s efforts to wrest back control from the military, in due course adding to the war’s end.
In more current times, India has actually looked for to utilize disclosure of info– if not intelligence– throughout times of crisis and dispute, normally with Pakistan, to tactical ends. Following airstrikes on horror camps in Balakot in 2019, the Indian Air Force revealed media outlets satellite images showing that SPICE rockets had actually been utilized on Pakistani targets. Throughout Operation Sindoor, top quality satellite images validating the damage done to Pakistani fear camps and military bases was exposed in interview performed by the Foreign Secretary and agents of the militaries.
A deep-rooted culture of secrecy within India’s administration has actually left the intelligence neighborhood reticent to reveal the intelligence it has, notified by legitimate issues about the possible compromise of sources and techniques.
Crucial elements have actually impeded the efficiency of India’s usage of SID. SID has actually mainly been utilized as a post-facto step to determine or show one’s success throughout durations of crisis, rather than pre-emptively to weaken the opponent’s spirits or trigger public humiliation as part of a collective peacetime technique. Second, other than for the Kargil War, the intelligence divulged has actually primarily included making use of fixed images inadequate to an age of public broadcasting controlled by the 30-second, audio-visual centric Instagram Reel or YouTube short. Third, arguments around SID in India have actually happened muddied by domestic politicisation as a function of its democratic politics, providing itself to exploitation by India’s foes– as observed in the needs for concrete ‘evidence’ of India’s surgical strikes versus Pakistan in 2016. A deep-rooted culture of secrecy within India’s administration has actually left the intelligence neighborhood reticent to divulge the intelligence it has, notified by legitimate issues about the possible compromise of sources and techniques. In spite of the credibility of the latter issue, India needs to not let secrecy prevent it from the benefits of a clear technique and teaching around SID in a more transparent period, when that intelligence is effectively sanitised and selectively declassified.
Suggestions and the Way Forward
What does the future of SID appear like in an Indian context? SID should come to be seen not as a post-facto technique of reason, however as a semi-kinetic procedure suggested to persuade the foe in both peacetime and throughout crisis/conflict by triggering it international shame, and restricting its tactical options by making its next actions public understanding. The mental effect of such a technique would be enormous, keeping the foe off guard most time.
Audio-visual abundant intelligence item, much better fit to combination into an info warfare technique distributed by short-form video material on social networks, films/documentaries, podcasts, and so forth, might be prioritised as part of a possible method towards SID.
Second, the intelligence revealed as part of this method need to progress beyond using satellite images alone. There are reasonable reasons that such images has actually been made use of throughout both the Balakot operation in 2019 and throughout Operation Sindoor in 2025– by exposing satellite images that can be gotten as quickly by industrial platforms like Maxar, India prevents revealing sources and approaches essential to intelligence collection. As the R&AW’s interception and public release of top-level phone calls in Pakistan throughout the Kargil War revealed, Indian intelligence has the capability to choose up on audio and even visual-rich intelligence items– and openly reveal it to disastrous impact. Audio-visual abundant intelligence item, much better fit to combination into a details warfare technique shared by short-form video material on social networks, films/documentaries, podcasts, and so on, might be prioritised as part of a possible method towards SID.
Third, SID and info warfare need to happen viewed as the exact same. Intelligence might just be exposed once its disclosure is identified to draw a most likely reaction from a foe that eventually constrains its tactical movement in one method, shape, or kind. It should be tailored to provoke a response by reaching the very heart of social, spiritual, civil, or administrative cracks within the foe’s polity.
The intelligence company is, by meaning, shrouded in secrecy– as it should be. In an age where digital interactions and simple, near-ubiquitous access to public broadcasting have actually come to improve the info landscape, India’s intelligence landscape should adjust. SID might not be a remedy– however it definitely goes a long method in enhancing our tactical heft and efficiency.
Archishman Ray Goswami is a Non-Resident Junior Fellow with the Observer Research Foundation.
The views revealed above come from the author(s). ORF research study and analyses now offered on Telegram! Click on this link to gain access to our curated material– blog sites, longforms and interviews.