Through worldwide eyes: How world leaders see Trump’s diplomacy, unilateralism and international impact

President Donald Trump’s 2nd term has actually been substantial not just for the United States however for the worldwide order, drawing diverse responses from world leaders at the United Nations General Assembly today.

From appreciation to criticism, worldwide leaders weighed in on Trump’s policies, actions and technique to diplomacy, highlighting the polarising effect of his presidency.

French President Emmanuel Macron used a lighter anecdote showing Trump’s logistical existence: after coming across a roadway closure due to the United States president’s motorcade, Macron joked about waiting in the street and asked for a conversation on the Gaza scenario. The exchange highlighted both Trump’s impact and the casual characteristics he gives top-level diplomacy.

Chinese Premier Li Qiang, on the other hand, highlighted the financial repercussions of unilateral steps, keeping in mind that worldwide financial stagnancy is partially driven by “tariff walkings and erection of walls and barriers,” implicitly referencing Trump’s protectionist policies. He required partnership to promote inclusive financial globalization, a direct review of Trump-era financial unilateralism.

Advocates of Trump, on the other hand, applauded his domestic and global steps. Argentina’s President Javier Milei praised Trump’s position on unlawful migration and his restructuring of trade and institutional practices, explaining them as definitive and transformative.

Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan and Cambodian Deputy Prime Minister Sokhonn Prak credited Trump with essential functions in moderating peace procedures, highlighting his capability to broker ceasefires and assist in discussion. Leaders from Congo, Haiti, and Saint Kitts and Nevis applauded Trump’s engagement on peacekeeping and local security.

Criticism was similarly pointed. Bolivian President Luis Arce implicated Trump of pursuing hegemonic power at the expenditure of worldwide stability, while Colombian President Gustavo Petro condemned U.S. anti-drug operations and rocket strikes, straight linking Trump. Slovenia’s President Nataša Pirc Musar and Belarusian Foreign Minister Maxim Ryzhenkov voiced issues over the U.S. withdrawal from worldwide arrangements and decreased assistance for U.N. organizations, framing Trump’s actions as destructive to multilateralism.

Actions likewise showed nuanced positions. Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov explained Trump’s administration as looking for practical cooperation over ideological rigidness, while Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy stressed collective capacity in conferences with Trump.

Indian Foreign Minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar highlighted environment action issues, implicitly critiquing U.S. ecological policies under Trump. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu applauded Trump’s handling of antisemitism, while Palestinian leader Mahmoud Abbas revealed desire to work together with Trump on dispute resolution.

Around the world, leaders’ responses to Trump exposed both the reach and the debate of his presidency. While some hailed him as a definitive problem-solver and peace broker, others represented his actions as aggressive, unilateral, and disruptive to global standards.

The U.N. General Assembly therefore used a microcosm of how Trump’s policies are viewed: a mix of regard, scepticism, and outright opposition, showing the withstanding and polarising impact of the United States under his management.

Whether admired for diplomacy or criticised for unilateralism, Trump’s method continues to form international discourse, leaving an enduring mark on global relations that goes beyond domestic politics.