![Spokespeople and attorneys for the companies did not immediately respond to requests for comment on the decision [File]](https://www.thehindu.com/theme/images/th-online/1x1_spacer.png "Spokespeople and attorneys for the companies did not immediately respond to requests for comment on the decision [File]")
Spokespeople and lawyers for the business did not instantly react to ask for discuss
Expert system business Anthropic lost a quote on Monday to dismiss parts of a copyright violation claim brought by music publishers over Anthropic’s supposed abuse of their tune lyrics in its AI training.
U.S. District Judge Eumi Lee ruled that Universal Music Group, Concord and ABKCO can continue pushing their claims that Anthropic allowed its users to infringe their copyrights by replicating their lyrics through its chatbot Claude without consent.
Spokespeople and lawyers for the business did not right away react to ask for talk about the choice. The claim is among numerous high-stakes conflicts in between copyright owners and tech business consisting of OpenAI, Microsoft and Meta Platforms over the unapproved usage of copyrighted works to train AI systems.
Amazon- and Google-backed Anthropic is the very first significant AI business to settle among the disagreements, concurring in August to pay a group of authors $1.5 billion to solve a class action suit. The pending cases will likely focus on whether AI systems make “fair use” of copyrighted product by studying it to find out to produce brand-new, transformative material. Lee’s judgment on Monday concentrated on the music publishers’ different argument that Anthropic’s display screen of their lyrics by users’ demand made up contributing or vicarious copyright violation.
< img data-src-template ="https://th-i.thgim.com/public/incoming/h2m8xo/article70111597.ece/alternates/SQUARE_80/2025-09-25T223814Z_474966659_RC29ZGADRRK3_RTRMADP_3_ANTHROPIC-AI-COPYRIGHT-SETTLEMENT.JPG" src ="https://th-i.thgim.com/public/incoming/h2m8xo/article70111597.ece/alternates/SQUARE_80/2025-09-25T223814Z_474966659_RC29ZGADRRK3_RTRMADP_3_ANTHROPIC-AI-COPYRIGHT-SETTLEMENT.JPG" alt data-device-variant ="SQUARE~SQUARE~SQUARE~SQUARE" width ="100%" height ="100%">
The publishers took legal action against Anthropic in 2023, declaring that it infringed their copyrights in lyrics from a minimum of 500 tunes by artists consisting of Beyonce, the Rolling Stones and the Beach Boys. Lee’s Monday choice declined Anthropic’s demand to dismiss the publishers’ secondary claims, discovering the labels plausibly argued that Anthropic might have understood of its users’ supposed violation and made money from enabling it.
The judge had actually formerly given Anthropic’s movement to dismiss the claims however allowed the publishers to modify them.
The case is Concord Music Group Inc v. Anthropic PBC, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, No. 5:24-cv-03811.