EU punish Google with $3.5 bn charge for abusing advertisement tech market power

0
2

European Union regulators on Friday struck Google with a 2.95 billion euro ($3.5 billion) fine for breaching the bloc’s competitors guidelines by favouring its own digital marketing services, marking the 4th such antitrust charge for the business along with a retreat from previous risks to separate the tech giant.

The European Union on Friday enforced a EUR2.95 billion ($ 3.5 billion) charge on Google, ruling that the business abused its supremacy in digital marketing by providing favoritism to its own services, the 4th significant antitrust fine versus the tech giant in Europe and a softening of earlier hazards from Brussels to think about separating its service.

The European Commission, the bloc’s executive arm and chief antitrust regulator, stated Google should put an end to its “self-preferencing” behaviour and embrace procedures to get rid of “disputes of interest” throughout its marketing innovation supply chain.

STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS ADVERTISEMENT

Turning down the decision, Google stated it disagreed with the findings and validated it would challenge the judgment through an appeal.

“It enforces an unjustified fine and needs modifications that will injure countless European companies by making it harder for them to generate income,” Lee-Anne Mulholland, the business’s international head of regulative affairs, stated in a declaration.

More from World

EU chief's plane targeted by suspected Russian GPS jamming during Bulgaria visit < img nw18-data-src ="https://images.firstpost.com/uploads/2025/09/Delhi-traffic-Sept-2023-Reuters-2025-09-a1e240e40d80cd4d0e618c7f80813507.jpg?im=FitAndFill=(100,56)" alt ="Say no to black cars? How your vehicle's colour could be heating up your city" width ="100" height ="56" title ="Say no to black cars? How your vehicle's colour could be heating up your city" loading ="lazy" src ="https://images.firstpost.com/uploads/2025/09/Delhi-traffic-Sept-2023-Reuters-2025-09-a1e240e40d80cd4d0e618c7f80813507.jpg?im=FitAndFill=(100,56)"> < img nw18-data-src ="https://images.firstpost.com/uploads/2024/12/Ursula-Von-der-Leyen-EU-Mercosur-deal-2024-12-1070eb1999b137d8e1945579ee0babed.jpg?im=FitAndFill=(100,56)"alt ="EU chief's plane targeted by suspected Russian GPS jamming during Bulgaria visit"width ="100"height ="56"title ="EU chief's plane targeted by suspected Russian GPS jamming during Bulgaria visit"loading ="lazy"src ="https://images.firstpost.com/uploads/2024/12/Ursula-Von-der-Leyen-EU-Mercosur-deal-2024-12-1070eb1999b137d8e1945579ee0babed.jpg?im=FitAndFill=(100,56)">

The choice was long past due, coming more than 2 years after the European Commission revealed antitrust charges versus Google.

The commission had actually stated at the time that the only method to please antitrust issues about Google’s financially rewarding digital advertisement organization was to sell parts of its organization. This choice marks a retreat from that earlier position and comes amidst restored stress in between Brussels and the Trump administration over trade, tariffs and innovation guideline.

Leading EU authorities had actually stated previously that the commission was looking for a forced sale due to the fact that previous cases that ended with fines and requirements for Google to stop anti-competitive practices have actually not worked, enabling the business to continue its behaviour in a various type.

The commission’s charge follows an official examination that it opened in June 2021, checking out whether Google broke the bloc’s competitors guidelines by favouring its own online screen marketing innovation services at the expenditure of competing publishers, marketers and marketing innovation services.

Its examination discovered that Google “mistreated” its dominant positions in the ad-technology environment, the commission stated.

STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS ADVERTISEMENT

Online screen advertisements are banners and text that appear on sites and are individualized based upon a web user’s searching history.

Mulholland stated, “There’s absolutely nothing anticompetitive in supplying services for advertisement purchasers and sellers, and there are more options to our services than ever previously.”

With inputs from firms